Contains graphic illustration of a computer on a desktop with the words "The Blog" wrote across it.

Case Study: Cost of Non-compliance

by

Case Study: The Cost of Non-Compliance with AODA in Canada

Accessibility in the digital and physical world has become more than just a legal obligation; it is a moral responsibility to ensure everyone, regardless of ability, has equal access. The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) sets the standard in Ontario, Canada, for making environments accessible. This case study examines a real-life situation where a business faced legal action due to its failure to comply with AODA regulations, highlighting the risks and consequences of neglecting accessibility requirements.

Background

In 2017, a popular restaurant chain in Ontario found itself at the center of a legal dispute over AODA compliance. The lawsuit was initiated by a customer with a visual impairment who experienced difficulties navigating the restaurant’s website to make a reservation. The website lacked essential accessibility features, such as screen reader compatibility and keyboard navigation support, making it impossible for visually impaired customers to access the services independently. This situation resulted in not only inconvenience but also discrimination against customers with disabilities.

The Legal Issue

The plaintiff argued that the restaurant chain violated the AODA’s accessibility standards, specifically the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA. These guidelines were integrated into the AODA to ensure that all public-facing websites are accessible to users with disabilities. By not meeting these standards, the restaurant was accused of failing to provide equal access to its services, thus discriminating against individuals with disabilities.

Outcome of the Lawsuit

The case was settled out of court, but it highlighted the importance of AODA compliance for businesses operating in Ontario. The restaurant chain agreed to a settlement that included the following actions:

  1. Website Redesign: The restaurant chain committed to redesigning its website to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, ensuring accessibility for all users, including those with visual impairments. This redesign included features like text alternatives for images, improved color contrast, and accessible forms.
  2. Training for Staff: The settlement also required the restaurant chain to provide accessibility training for its web development team and customer service staff. This training aimed to increase awareness and understanding of accessibility needs and best practices.
  3. Regular Accessibility Audits: To maintain compliance, the company agreed to conduct regular accessibility audits of its digital properties and physical locations. These audits would help identify potential accessibility issues and ensure they are addressed promptly.
  4. Public Apology and Awareness Campaign: As part of the settlement, the restaurant chain issued a public apology to the affected customer and launched an awareness campaign highlighting the importance of accessibility and the company’s commitment to inclusivity.

Lessons Learned

This case serves as a critical reminder for businesses in Ontario and across Canada about the importance of AODA compliance. Here are key takeaways for organizations:

  1. Proactive Compliance: Waiting for a complaint or lawsuit to enforce compliance is costly and damaging to a business’s reputation. Proactively ensuring that all digital and physical spaces are accessible can prevent legal action and build a positive brand image.
  2. Regular Audits and Updates: Accessibility is not a one-time project but an ongoing commitment. Regular audits and updates to websites and physical environments are essential to maintain compliance with evolving standards and technologies.
  3. Employee Training: Training staff on accessibility standards and practices is crucial. Employees should be aware of the importance of accessibility and know how to implement and maintain accessible solutions.
  4. Inclusive Design Philosophy: Incorporating accessibility into the design and development process from the beginning ensures that accessibility is a fundamental consideration, not an afterthought.

Conclusion

The AODA sets clear standards for accessibility in Ontario, and non-compliance can result in legal challenges, financial penalties, and reputational damage. Businesses must recognize the importance of accessibility as a moral and legal obligation. By taking proactive steps to ensure accessibility, companies can not only avoid costly lawsuits but also create an inclusive environment that benefits all customers, regardless of their abilities. This case study underscores the need for ongoing education, awareness, and action to achieve true accessibility and inclusivity in our society.